The idea of creating a visual series designed in the form of playing cards matured gradually, as various historical materials on the subject of the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878 were collected. Despite the distance of these events from our own time, their dramatic power has not diminished in the least. Moreover, many parallels with today's realities encourage us to take a fresh look at what happened in the Balkans in the third quarter of the 19th century. Particularly noteworthy are the attempts to reinterpret these events to suit a Eurocentric agenda — attempts being made in Bulgaria, Romania, and the countries of the former Yugoslavia. Turkey, which considers itself the successor of the Ottoman Empire, also has its own perspective on these events. At the same time, outside of the current political context, it can be stated with confidence that the battle for Pleven and the closely connected epic of Shipka became the watershed that, on the one hand, united the Bulgarian and Russian peoples, and on the other, finally put an end to Ottoman rule in Europe. What is more, the soldiers of all the countries involved in the fighting displayed wonders of heroism, endurance, and courage. It is to them that this project is dedicated.
The Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878 was the culmination of the long-running "Eastern Question" - the struggle of the European empires for influence in the Balkans and for the fate of the declining Ottoman Empire. By the mid-1870s, the national liberation movement of the Balkan peoples had reached a critical point. In 1875, an uprising broke out in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in the spring of 1876, the April Uprising erupted in Bulgaria. Today, it looks as though the Bulgarians were deliberately handed over to slaughter. Their actions were uncoordinated, their leaders - Vasil Levski, for example - had died before the uprising began, and the Ottomans, especially the irregular bashibazouk units, crushed it with unprecedented brutality: by various estimates, between 15,000 and 30,000 civilians were killed. Villages were massacred in their entirety, and the atrocities in Batak shocked all of Europe and were deliberately covered by journalists in such a way as to draw the attention of the Western public. It looks as though Europe needed a pretext to set the Ottomans and the Russians against each other. As a result, the rebels suffered a bloody defeat, but the victims changed public opinion in the West and in Russia — such titans as Victor Hugo, Charles Darwin, Oscar Wilde, and Giuseppe Garibaldi spoke out against Ottoman atrocities - in modern terms, opinion leaders.
Russia, regarded as the protector of the Orthodox peoples of the Balkans, faced a difficult choice. Emperor Alexander II delayed the start of the war, understanding that the army was in the midst of military reform and was not ready for large-scale action. Equipment was outdated, and there was a lack of necessary ammunition and winter clothing. However, the situation left no choice: Turkey, with British support, refused to make concessions and reforms for the Christian population, reducing them to formal promises. In October 1876, Russia, Austria, and Germany demanded that Turkey stop the war against Serbia, but the Porte, encouraged by London's position, stalled. No diplomatic way out remained.
In the spring and summer of 1876, news of the brutal suppression of the uprising had the effect of an exploding bomb in Russia. The Russian press competed in reporting the atrocities of the Turkish punitive forces and the irregular bashibazouk units: tens of thousands of civilians had been killed, hundreds of villages and towns burned. These reports provoked outrage and indignation across all layers of Russian society.
Slavic committees, led by prominent Slavophiles such as Ivan Aksakov, launched a broad campaign to collect donations for Bulgarian refugees, widows, and orphans. Their appeals found a lively response among the most diverse people. The Church organized donation collections throughout the country. The writer Fyodor Dostoevsky appealed to the government demanding immediate assistance to the Bulgarians.
On April 12 (24), 1877, Emperor Alexander II declared war on the Ottoman Empire. However, there was no land border between the two countries on the western coast of the Black Sea. The Principality of Romania found itself caught between two fires: formally it was a vassal of the Porte, but its Prince Carol I and the ruling circles saw in a war against their suzerain a chance to gain full independence. Initially, Romania declared neutrality, but Russian troops, entering its territory, used it as a staging ground. Already in May 1877, the Romanian parliament, not without lobbying by Carol I, proclaimed the country's independence, and Romania then concluded a military convention with Russia, fielding a 60,000-strong army that played a key role not only in the subsequent siege of Pleven but also in the outcome of the entire war.
At first, the positions of the continental Great Powers also favored Russia — they were interested in defeating the Ottomans with someone else's hands. Thanks to the diplomacy of Chancellor A.M. Gorchakov and the support of Germany (Bismarck was interested in a situational alliance with Russia), neutrality was secured from the continental Western countries. Only Britain traditionally "made trouble" from its island — fearing Russia's strengthening in the Balkans and a threat to the Straits, it closely monitored the course of the campaign and threatened intervention. Austria-Hungary, being under Germany's influence, also watched closely — and, as it later turned out, was preparing to extract its own benefit from someone else's victory.
The Russian army's entry into the Balkans was swift. The troops crossed the Danube and, with rapid strikes, captured several settlements. The detachments of Russian and Bulgarian druzhinas moved so swiftly and successfully that bravado reigned among the advancing forces and "dizziness from success" set in.
On July 4, 1877, General Krüdener's troops took the Turkish fortress of Nikopol - a triumph that further raised the spirits of the troops - and on July 5, General Gurko's advance detachment occupied Tarnovo, the ancient capital of Bulgaria. It seemed that victory was near — the army was reaching the Balkan range, and beyond it lay operational space and the road to Istanbul. However, the unpreparedness of the Russian command, the lack of communication between the detachments, and the rapid forced march of the 17,000-strong corps of Osman Nuri Pasha from Vidin, which occupied Pleven on July 19, 1877, turned the swift and successful offensive into a protracted war of attrition.
The first two assaults on Pleven (July 8 and 18) ended in catastrophe: the Russians lost about 10,000 men killed and wounded. The Turks, on the defensive, suffered incomparably smaller losses, and their engineering fortifications were built according to all the rules of European fortification art. The Emperor of Russia was forced to ask for help from Carol I, whose troops joined the siege of the city.
The question arose of the success of the entire war. Without taking the city, it was impossible to move further, leaving serious Ottoman defensive forces in the rear. Moreover, complications began on other sectors of the front as well. In late July, the battle of Stara Zagora (Eski Zagra) ended in failure for the allies, and the Samara Flag - a symbol of the Bulgarian revival - was nearly lost. The advance to the south was halted.
In late August came the third assault - the largest of all, in which Russian and Romanian troops lost 16,000 men. General Skobelev's detachment on the left flank managed to break through the Turkish defenses and approach the city, but the command did not support him with reserves, and he was forced to retreat with heavy losses. The most likely reason was the dislike of the "White General" on the part of the reigning family and especially the Emperor's brother. After this, the Russian commander-in-chief - Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich - was removed from leadership, and Eduard Totleben - a military engineer who had made his name defending Sevastopol during the Crimean War - was called in to help. He put an end to the useless assaults and began a methodical blockade of the city.
Simultaneously with the siege of Pleven, Russo-Bulgarian forces held the defense of the Shipka Pass (July–December 1877) - a strategic passage through the Balkans. A small detachment under the command of General Stoletov, including Bulgarian opalchenie volunteers, withstood several Turkish attacks, tying down significant enemy forces and preventing them from breaking through and relieving Osman Nuri Pasha in Pleven. These two battles can be viewed as a single element of the campaign, since the fall of Shipka would have led to the defeat of the allied army in the war, the retreat of troops back across the Danube, and the most tragic consequences for the Bulgarian population.
In the end, it was Pleven and Shipka that became the key to the entire war. The heroic defense of the city by Ottoman troops tied down a 125,000-strong Russo-Romanian force for four months, paralyzed the advance on Constantinople, and allowed the Turkish command to strengthen the capital and Adrianople. This did not save the Porte from defeat, but denying the courage of the defenders would be unjust - it was no accident that Alexander II ordered Osman Nuri Pasha's saber returned to him after the defeat. When on November 28 (December 10), 1877, the garrison of Pleven, exhausted by hunger and disease, attempted to break the blockade, it was defeated, and the army (43,000 prisoners) capitulated.
In late August came the third assault - the largest of all, in which Russian and Romanian troops lost 16,000 men. General Skobelev's detachment on the left flank managed to break through the Turkish defenses and approach the city, but the command did not support him with reserves, and he was forced to retreat with heavy losses. The most likely reason was the dislike of the "White General" on the part of the reigning family and especially the Emperor's brother. After this, the Russian commander-in-chief - Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich - was removed from leadership, and Eduard Totleben - a military engineer who had made his name defending Sevastopol during the Crimean War - was called in to help. He put an end to the useless assaults and began a methodical blockade of the city.
Simultaneously with the siege of Pleven, Russo-Bulgarian forces held the defense of the Shipka Pass (July–December 1877) - a strategic passage through the Balkans. A small detachment under the command of General Stoletov, including Bulgarian opalchenie volunteers, withstood several Turkish attacks, tying down significant enemy forces and preventing them from breaking through and relieving Osman Nuri Pasha in Pleven. These two battles can be viewed as a single element of the campaign, since the fall of Shipka would have led to the defeat of the allied army in the war, the retreat of troops back across the Danube, and the most tragic consequences for the Bulgarian population.
In the end, it was Pleven and Shipka that became the key to the entire war. The heroic defense of the city by Ottoman troops tied down a 125,000-strong Russo-Romanian force for four months, paralyzed the advance on Constantinople, and allowed the Turkish command to strengthen the capital and Adrianople. This did not save the Porte from defeat, but denying the courage of the defenders would be unjust — it was no accident that Alexander II ordered Osman Nuri Pasha's saber returned to him after the defeat. When on November 28 (December 10), 1877, the garrison of Pleven, exhausted by hunger and disease, attempted to break the blockade, it was defeated, and the army (43,000 prisoners) capitulated.
The fall of Pleven became the turning point. Russian troops gained the opportunity to cross the Balkans. Gurko occupied Sofia, Skobelev broke through to the Sea of Marmara, and in January 1878 the Russian army reached the outskirts of Constantinople - San Stefano. The British had to threaten Russia with war to prevent its troops from entering Istanbul.
On February 19 (March 3), 1878, a peace treaty was signed at San Stefano. Its terms were more than favorable for Russia and the Balkan peoples: a large autonomous Bulgaria was created, the independence of Serbia, Montenegro, and Romania was recognized, Russia received Kars, Ardahan, and Batum in the Transcaucasus and regained Southern Bessarabia.
However, the victory on the battlefield was soon undone at the negotiating table. Already in the summer of 1878, on the initiative of the instigator of the war - Britain - and Austria-Hungary, a congress convened in Berlin under Bismarck's chairmanship. Russia, deprived of Germany's support and finding itself in diplomatic isolation, was forced to agree to a revision of the Treaty of San Stefano. Bulgaria was divided into three parts, Bosnia and Herzegovina were placed under Austria-Hungary's control, and Britain received Cyprus. Russia's main territorial gains were preserved, but its political influence in the Balkans was severely limited.
"The Berlin Congress is a black page in the history of Russian diplomacy," Chancellor Gorchakov would later say. And indeed, the sacrifices and the victory proved to be merely a prologue to new conflicts that ultimately led to the First World War.
A deck of cards is not just a souvenir. Every card here is a story: about strategies, tactics, and the people who determined the fate of entire nations. About those who built fortifications, led columns into the attack, fell on the battlefields at Pleven and Shipka, about those who tried to save an empire - and about those who stood behind the scenes, defining the borders on the map of the world. Study, play, remember.
The Ace of Hearts composition is a visual narrative of the Bulgarian path to freedom. The motley weaponry of the chetniks embodies the long years of resistance. The modern rifle and the revolver associated with Levski are symbols of hope, organization, and the transition to a decisive armed struggle in which the Bulgarian opalchentsi proved themselves worthy of freedom, earning it on the battlefields of 1876 and 1877–1878.
At the center of the deck's highest card is a wreath of laurel leaves (glory) and oak leaves (strength), framing the composition and symbolizing both the triumph and the endurance shown in the liberation struggle. The wreath is entwined with a ribbon in the colors of the Bulgarian national flag — white, green, and red - approved after the war but first proposed in 1871. This tricolor represents peace, strength, and the blood shed for freedom. Its presence here is a sign that the struggle was waged for the creation of a new, independent Bulgaria, and not merely for a change of power.
In the foreground is the papakha of a Bulgarian opalchenets. This was the standard headgear introduced for the druzhinas to distinguish them from the regular Russian army. A key detail is the Orthodox cross of yellow metal on the cockade. It not only indicated the soldier's faith but was also a powerful symbol of identity, setting the Orthodox Bulgarian opalchentsi in opposition to the Ottoman Empire.
Behind the papakha are crossed rifles. The richly decorated flintlock musket known as the "boylia" is a striking example of the weapons produced in the Bulgarian arms-making center of Sliven. It was the primary weapon of the Bulgarian chetniks and rebels in the long guerrilla war against the Ottomans. This weapon is a symbol of centuries of struggle and continuity. The chetniks operated outside the law, at risk to their lives, and their weapons were as "illegal" and individual as their struggle. The presence of this musket alongside a modern rifle highlights the transition from a makeshift, spontaneous struggle to an organized military force.
The Chassepot rifle, Model 1866, is a French needle-fire rifle - the main weapon of the regular Bulgarian opalchenie (later the Zemstvo Army), formed within the Russian army. The Chassepot was an advanced breech-loading rifle for its time, superior to many older models. The weapons for the opalchentsi were purchased with donations from the Moscow Slavic Committee. This highlights the role of public support and fraternal assistance in the creation of Bulgarian military forces. The rifle symbolizes the transition from a spontaneous struggle to organized military resistance. The opalchentsi, armed with these weapons, fought side by side with the Russian army, proving their combat capability in key battles such as the Battle of Stara Zagora and the defense of Shipka.
The flintlock pistol, like the musket, is a weapon of revolutionaries. It was part of the chetniks' arsenal, a symbol of their readiness for battle. The Gasser M1870 revolver is a more modern, factory-made weapon. It was popular in Europe and, most symbolically, it was precisely this type of revolver that was the personal weapon of Vasil Levski - a national hero and the ideologue of the Bulgarian struggle. Its presence on the card is a direct reference to the hero who did not live to see his country's freedom, but whose ideas and sacrifice became the spiritual foundation for the subsequent liberation.
The crossed Balkan yataghan and Russian Cossack shashka, Model 1834, embody two important aspects of the war. The traditional weapon of the Ottoman adversary, captured in battle, symbolizes the military valor and success of the Bulgarians and their allies. The Russian shashka is a weapon that reached the opalchentsi from the arsenals of the Imperial Army. It symbolizes combat brotherhood, support, and the unification of forces for the achievement of a common goal.
Bulgaria had no statehood before the Liberation War, and consequently no "monarch" existed either. The most prominent leader of the liberation movement - Vasil Levski - died several years before the events described. The same fate befell Hristo Botev, as well as a number of other leaders of the uprising. Therefore, our choice for the role of "King" of the Bulgarians fell on Panayot Hitov (1830–1918), who took direct part in the war of 1877–1878.
A legendary Bulgarian voivode (haydut), a national hero whose life became a symbol of the unceasing struggle against the Ottoman yoke. A veteran of the Crimean War, he was a recognized "expert on the Balkan mountains," an indispensable guide and adviser to the Russian command in 1877. His guerrilla experience was invaluable: he knew every path, every spring in the mountains. During the Russo-Turkish War, Hitov led Bulgarian volunteers, and his detachments carried out reconnaissance and disrupted enemy communications. He embodied the centuries-old tradition of Bulgarian resistance, a bridge between the revolutionary chetniks and the regular army. His life is the embodiment of a struggle that lasted not years but decades, and ended in victory.
For the role of the Queen of Hearts, Rayna Knyaginya was chosen. Her real name was Rayna Genchova. She made the banner for the Panagyurishte Uprising and was arrested by the Turks. They wanted to execute her, but Russian diplomats intervened. After her release and exile, she became a living symbol of resistance.
Although the illustration depicts a specific historical figure, in our project she is more of a poetic image, embodying the courage of Bulgarian women who rose to defend their land. During the April Uprising of 1876, many of them fought shoulder to shoulder with the men, carried cartridges, bandaged the wounded, and even took part in combat.
Rayna Knyaginya on the card is the image of that very amazon - a Bulgarian woman who overcame her fears, took up arms, and stood in the ranks to defend her home and her faith, fighting for freedom against centuries of slavery.
The Jack of Hearts is represented by an Opalchenets-Chetnik. The image of the people's hero is a composite portrait of the Bulgarian volunteer who went from the guerrilla detachments (cheti) to the formation of the druzhinas of the Bulgarian opalchenie within the Russian army. Visually, his portrait refers to the fearless Hristo Botev - poet and revolutionary - who died in battle before the war, leading a detachment in 1876. He became the spiritual banner of the struggle.
This Jack-opalchenets is not merely a soldier but a people's defender, combining the freedom of the haydut with the discipline of the regular army. He was armed with outdated weapons but burned with faith in liberation. His sacrifice and heroism showed Europe that the Bulgarian people would not resign themselves to slavery, and it was precisely this self-sacrifice that served as the prologue to the war of 1877 and the final liberation from the Ottoman yoke.
The numbered cards of the Hearts suit present various types of Bulgarian chetniks and druzhina opalchentsi. The lower cards show warriors of different ages. In the guerrilla detachments (cheti) active in the 1870s, people of different generations indeed fought side by side - from youths to veterans white with age.
Their weaponry was extremely varied: alongside captured Turkish rifles and yataghans, old flintlock guns of local manufacture were used, as well as hunting pieces. By the time of the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878, many chetniks had joined the ranks of the Bulgarian opalchenie, forming its combat core. The cheti themselves in 1877 operated as an auxiliary force: they conducted reconnaissance, disrupted enemy communications, and maintained contact with the local population. Their motley appearance and weaponry symbolized the nationwide, spontaneous character of the Bulgarian resistance, which was not the work of the regular army alone.
The backbone of the Bulgarian opalchenie consisted of infantry druzhinas. Initially, the opalchentsi performed garrison duty and guarded the rear, but their baptism of fire came at the Battle of Stara Zagora on July 19 (31), 1877. Two thousand Bulgarian opalchentsi, together with Russian troops, went into battle against the 15,000-strong army of Suleiman Pasha. The fight was brutal and unequal. Although the city had to be abandoned, the opalchentsi showed exceptional steadfastness: the 3rd druzhina, fighting under the Samara Flag, lost more than half its strength but did not waver. This battle, though it ended in a tactical retreat, proved that the Bulgarian opalchenie was a combat-capable force worthy of fighting within the Russian army. General Gurko highly praised their valor, calling them "the core of the future Bulgarian army."
The command staff of the druzhinas was composed mainly of Russian officers, as well as Bulgarians who had served in the Russian army.
Overall command of the Bulgarian opalchenie was exercised by Major General Nikolai Grigoryevich Stoletov, a talented officer who managed to prepare the volunteers for combat in a short time.
Among the druzhina commanders, Lieutenant Colonel Pavel Pavlovich Kalitin, commander of the 3rd Banner Druzhina, stood out in particular. His heroic death while saving the Samara Flag at Stara Zagora became a symbol of self-sacrifice and Russo-Bulgarian combat brotherhood. The presence of experienced, often professional military men at the head of the druzhinas ensured the opalchenie not only high morale but also the necessary military training, which allowed them to withstand the most severe trials.
The Seven of Hearts card illustrates the ceremony of the presentation of the Samara Flag. This flag is the main sacred relic of the Bulgarian opalchenie and one of the key symbols of the liberation war.
The banner was made in Samara at the expense of the city's residents on the initiative of Pyotr Alabin and Efim Kozhevnikov. On May 18 (May 6, Old Style), 1877, in the Romanian town of Ploiești, a solemn ceremony was held to present the banner to the 3rd druzhina of the opalchenie.
The ceremony was attended by the commander-in-chief of the Danube Army himself, Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich, which gave the event the status of international recognition. It was a white-red-blue banner bearing images of the Mother of God and Saints Cyril and Methodius. The opalchentsi carried the Samara Flag through all the major battles — at Stara Zagora, at Shipka, and at Sheynovo. For them it became not merely a battle flag but a symbol of hope, faith, and the fraternal assistance of the Russian people.
The mounted units within the Bulgarian opalchenie were few in number. Their main functions were reconnaissance, communication between detachments, and patrolling. Mounted opalchentsi often operated together with Cossack units of the Russian army, carrying out tasks to cover the flanks and pursue the retreating enemy. It is known that at the Battle of Stara Zagora, 1,500 Russian cavalrymen fought alongside the Bulgarian opalchentsi. Although cavalry did not play a decisive role in combat on the mountain passes, on flat terrain it was indispensable for rapid maneuvers, as well as for gathering information on the movements of Turkish troops.
The Nine of Hearts is dedicated to the Defense of Shipka - it became the high point of Russo-Bulgarian combat brotherhood. In August 1877, a small detachment (about 6,000 men) under the command of General Stoletov, consisting of Russian rifle regiments and five Bulgarian druzhinas, held off the attacks of the 17,000-strong Turkish army of Suleiman Pasha for six days. The Turks called Shipka "the heart of the Balkans" and "the key to the doors of Bulgaria." The opalchentsi fought shoulder to shoulder with Russian soldiers, displaying wonders of endurance. The defenders' losses amounted to about 3,350 men, including 2 generals and 108 officers killed. The heroic defense of Shipka tied down large Turkish forces and prevented them from transferring reinforcements to the besieged Pleven, which ultimately decided the fate of the campaign in favor of the allies. Shipka became a symbol of the unbending will and brotherhood of the two peoples.
The Bulgarian opalchenie became the foundation for the formation of a regular Bulgarian army (the Zemstvo Army) after the country's liberation. Its role in the war was not only combat-related - it embodied the revival of Bulgarian statehood and military tradition. In the ranks of the opalchentsi, albeit in small numbers, there were also women. The participation of at least 55 women in the haydut movement and the defense of towns during the April Uprising is documented. Some of them, such as the "Vidin Amazons," later distinguished themselves in battle after the liberation. The presence of women in the ranks of the defenders, even as nurses or standard-bearers, symbolized that the struggle for freedom had become a truly nationwide cause, uniting all Bulgarians regardless of gender or age. Their feat, often remaining in the shadow of men's battles, was an integral part of the path to freedom.
The Ace of Clubs composition is a concise and precise account of the Russian army in 1877: its victories and trials, the famous St. George ribbon that links the centuries, and the weapons with which soldiers went into the assaults on Pleven.
The St. George ribbon is one of the main symbols of Russian military glory. It was established by Empress Catherine II in 1769 as part of the Order of St. George the Victorious, which was awarded exclusively for personal courage on the battlefield. The black and yellow (orange) colors of the ribbon symbolized the smoke and flame of war and at the same time corresponded to the colors of the imperial coat of arms — a black double-headed eagle on a gold (yellow) field. During the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878, the ribbon was actively used on collective awards, and a little later, in 1878, it began to be sewn onto the sailor caps of the Guards crew. The continuity of this ribbon with the Guards ribbon used in Soviet times and which became one of the main symbols of Victory in the Great Patriotic War is no accident: it is a direct link to the heroic history of the Russian army, which through the St. George Crosses and Orders of Glory has survived to our days.
In the foreground is the classic kepi, the headgear of the Russian infantry of that time. In the 1860s it replaced the old shakos and became a symbol of the army's modernization. The key detail is the cockade with the imperial eagle, which indicates belonging to the Russian Imperial Army and its supreme command. In this headgear, soldiers went through all the hardships of the siege of Pleven and other battles.
Behind the kepi are two crossed rifles, which embody the process of rearming the Russian army. As one source notes, by the beginning of the Russo-Turkish War this reform had not yet been completed, so the infantry's armament was not uniform or perfect.
The Krnka rifle (Model 1869) - this weapon was a conversion of the old muzzle-loading rifle into a breech-loading one, carried out according to the system of the Czech gunsmith Sylvester Krnka. It had a large caliber - 6 lines (15.24 mm) - and was the main weapon of a significant part of the Russian infantry. However, its design had drawbacks: it was temperamental in wet weather, and cartridge extraction often failed, forcing soldiers to knock them out with a ramrod, which sharply reduced the rate of fire.
The Berdan Rifle No. 2 (Model 1870) - this was already a modern rifle with a sliding bolt. Its caliber was 4.2 lines (10.67 mm). The rifle was developed by the American Hiram Berdan but substantially improved by Russian engineers Gorlov and Gunius, who introduced more than 25 refinements, which is why in the United States it was sometimes called the "Russian rifle." By the end of the war, roughly one-third of the divisions engaged in combat in the Balkans were armed with the Berdan rifle. The presence of both models on the ace card highlights the transitional but heroic period, when soldiers fought with what they had - and won.
Behind the rifles can be seen crossed Cossack shashkas, Model 1838. This weapon had particular significance for the Cossacks. The shashka in its classic form came from the highlanders of the Caucasus and differed from the saber by the absence of a guard to protect the hand. The Cossack shashka, Model 1838, with a wooden grip and a blade 875 mm long, was a standard weapon and proved itself well in many wars, including the Balkan campaign of 1877. Emperor Alexander II, although he did not always favor the Cossacks, highly valued their fighting qualities and used them extensively in this war both for reconnaissance and for daring raids. The shashka here symbolizes not only the Cossacks as a branch of service but Russian edged weapons in general.
The card is complemented by Smith & Wesson Model 3 revolvers, specifically in the version created to Russia's order and known as the "Russian Model." The Russian Empire became one of the largest customers for this weapon: in 1871 it purchased 41,000 such revolvers in .44 Russian caliber, and they were subsequently produced under license both in Russia and in Germany. This was the first mass-produced Russian-pattern revolver in army service and one of the symbols of the technical modernization of warfare in that era.
His Imperial Majesty Sovereign Emperor Alexander II (1818–1881)
Ascended the throne in 1855, at the height of the Crimean War. His reign was marked by the Great Reforms, the most important of which was the abolition of serfdom (1861), for which he received the name "The Liberator" within the country. Alexander II's foreign policy was aimed at restoring Russia's international prestige after the Crimean defeat. In 1877, despite warnings from military advisers that the army was unprepared, the Emperor made the difficult decision to declare war on the Ottoman Empire, guided not so much by geopolitical advantage as by a sense of duty to his Orthodox brothers in the Balkans. His presence with the active army raised the fighting spirit of the troops. The war's outcome brought a long-awaited victory, but its terms were largely curtailed at the Berlin Congress, which came as a heavy blow to the Emperor, who had sought a just peace for the Slavic peoples.
Her Imperial Majesty Sovereign Empress Maria Alexandrovna (1824–1880)
Born Princess of Hesse-Darmstadt, wife of Alexander II. In 1877, despite a severe illness (tuberculosis), she found the strength to lead the activities of the Russian Red Cross Society in the theater of war. The Empress personally oversaw the organization of hospitals, the dispatch of medicines and dressing materials to the active army, and assistance to the wounded. Her deep faith, mercy, and personal modesty earned her sincere love in the army and among the people. At the height of the war, she was involved in organizing sanitary trains, making an invaluable contribution to saving the lives of thousands of soldiers. Her activity became a symbol of the fact that war is not only battles but also daily mercy and self-sacrifice.
Adjutant General, Engineer General Eduard Ivanovich Totleben (1818–1884)
An outstanding military engineer, hero of the defense of Sevastopol (Crimean War 1854–1855), where he created a system of fortifications that allowed the city to hold out for almost a year.
In 1877, after the failed assaults on Pleven, Totleben was urgently summoned to the active army. His brilliant idea was simple and cruel to the enemy: not to take Pleven by storm but to take it by hunger, creating a complete blockade ring. He abandoned senseless bloody attacks and carried out a brilliant operation to cut off the supply routes. It was precisely his methodical, engineering, "dry" work that for several months locked Osman Pasha's army in the city, turning it into a trap and predetermining its capitulation. He thought of fortresses as living organisms requiring not a blow but strangulation.
The Two of Clubs card is dedicated to Nikolai Ivanovich Pirogov (1810–1881) - a brilliant surgeon, the founder of military field surgery. His main principle was the triage of the wounded directly at the dressing station: some were operated on immediately, others were evacuated into the interior of the country. On February 14, 1847, Pirogov performed the first operation using ether anesthesia at the Obukhov Military Land Hospital. He became the first doctor in the world to use anesthesia in field conditions.
During the Crimean War, he was the first to apply a plaster cast in field conditions, saving many soldiers from amputation. In 1877–1878, despite his advanced age, Pirogov came to the theater of war and operated on both Russian and Bulgarian soldiers, summarizing his unique experience in the work "Military Medical Affairs in the Theater of War in Bulgaria in 1877–1878." His work saved thousands of lives, and in Bulgaria his name is surrounded by particular reverence.
The Three of Clubs card illustrates the moment of raising the flag of a Russian regiment over the Grivitsa Redoubt No. 1. Its capture on August 30, 1877, became a symbol of the triumph of the allied forces.
The decisive contribution to the assault was made by the 17th Infantry Archangelgorod and 18th Infantry Vologda Regiments. The raising of the Russian regimental flag on the summit meant that one of the main strongholds of the Turkish defense had fallen.
According to the description, by 19:30 the Russian and Romanian flags were already flying over the redoubt, and five guns and two Turkish banners were captured as trophies. This moment became a symbol of the combat brotherhood of the allied forces and their joint victory over a common enemy.
The Four of Clubs card illustrates a Cossack reconnaissance and sabotage detachment on a combat mission. Cutting Osman Pasha off from the outside world was one of the key conditions of the blockade.
The isolation of the Pleven garrison was made possible in part by the daring raids of Russian Cossack patrols, which cut telegraph lines. This deprived Osman Pasha of the ability to promptly request reinforcements, coordinate actions with Suleiman Pasha's army, and receive orders from Istanbul.
The garrison found itself in an informational and logistical "dead zone," which made it incapable of long-term resistance.
The Five of Clubs card illustrates Skobelev's Flying Detachment. During the siege of Pleven, the general actively employed the tactics of mobile "flying detachments."
His soldiers, supported by Gatling guns - one of the first prototypes of the machine gun in history, nicknamed the "Reapers of Death" - delivered unexpected strikes against the enemy's flanks and rear. These guns made it possible to create dense barrage fire at short distances, suppressing enemy infantry.
Skobelev, personally directing the battle, displayed wonders of tactical flexibility: he deployed troops using the folds of the terrain and concentrated fire on key points of the Turkish defense.
The Gods of War - the gunners - are depicted on the Six of Clubs. Artillery played a decisive role in the blockade and the assaults on Pleven. During the third assault, on August 30, Russian batteries kept up continuous fire on the Turkish fortifications. In the description of Skobelev's attack on the redoubt, it is said that he opened such murderous cannon fire that, from the intense action, many guns became unfit for combat.
The artillerymen cleared the way for the infantry, destroying redoubts and inflicting enormous losses on the enemy. Their work ultimately allowed the allies to break through the defense and force the garrison to capitulate.
The Seven of Clubs card illustrates General Skobelev himself at the moment of attack.
Mikhail Dmitrievich Skobelev (1843–1882) was the most brilliant figure of the war. For appearing in battle on a white horse and in a white uniform, he was nicknamed the "White General." During the third assault on Pleven (August 30–31), he personally led his troops against the redoubts of the southern sector. When his saber was broken and his horse killed, he continued to direct the attack and managed to seize the redoubts, but due to the lack of support he was forced to retreat.
This failure was explained by the dislike of him on the part of the commander-in-chief — Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich — the Emperor's brother. Skobelev, however, remained an idol of the soldiers and a national hero, for which he was later promoted to lieutenant general for the capture of Lovcha.
The Eight of Clubs is dedicated to the feat of Major Gortalov, who remained in the redoubt after his subordinates withdrew.
Major Fyodor Matveyevich Gortalov (1839–1877) commanded a battalion of the 61st Infantry Vladimir Regiment. On August 30, 1877, his battalion was the first to break into the enemy redoubt, attacking across a cornfield under hurricane fire. But during the attack, some of the soldiers fell behind, and Gortalov, leaving a commander in his place, went to look for them in order to gather all his forces to hold the position. At that moment he happened to meet Skobelev, who was hurrying to the redoubt and mistakenly accused him of cowardice. Gortalov returned to the redoubt. After the command failed to provide reserves, Skobelev ordered all the defenders to leave the fortification. However, Major Gortalov refused to carry out the order and died covering the withdrawal of the troops. He was raised on Turkish bayonets but fulfilled his duty to the end, holding the position. His feat is an example of the tragic fate of an officer who sacrificed himself for his comrades.
The Nine of Clubs illustrates an episode that occurred during the Ottoman army's attempt to break through the encirclement at the end of the blockade. On November 28 (December 10), 1877, when the starving garrison of Osman Pasha made its last attempt to break out across the Vit River, a fierce hand-to-hand struggle began.
In this fight, the Russian soldier (according to other sources, a non-commissioned officer) Yegor Zhdanov, in hand-to-hand combat, seized from the Turkish standard-bearer the most important prize — Osman Pasha's green banner. The capture of an enemy banner, which symbolized the capitulation and the breaking of the enemy army's spirit, became one of the most striking episodes of the final phase of the siege. This trophy was handed over to the command as proof of victory.
On November 28, 1877, Osman Pasha's breakout was repulsed, and the commander himself was severely wounded in the leg. The Turkish army was defeated. The exhausted garrison of Pleven capitulated.
The ceremonial surrender took place on December 10. Osman Nuri Pasha, wounded but unbroken, solemnly handed over his saber to Emperor Alexander II as a sign of capitulation (according to other accounts, it was presented on the Turk's behalf by General Ganetsky). The Tsar, who highly appreciated the courage of his opponent, ordered the saber returned to Osman Pasha, acknowledging his heroism and paying tribute to the steadfastness of the Turkish defender. This ceremony symbolized a chivalrous attitude toward the enemy, despite all the bloodshed of the war. Osman Nuri Pasha not only preserved his life but returned to the Porte, where he was received as a hero.
The decorative elements of the frame on the Bulgarian and Russian cards include the medal "In Memory of the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878." This is not merely a state award of the Russian Empire but a key symbolic artifact uniting the Russian and Bulgarian participants of that war.
The medal was established by a decree of Emperor Alexander II on April 17, 1878, at the end of the war, and its design was approved by the Emperor on September 14 of the same year. The award had three classes, distinguished by material - silver, light bronze, and dark bronze - which made it possible to divide participants according to their degree of involvement in the fighting.
The applicability of the medal to Bulgarian troops was directly stipulated in the decree: light-bronze and dark-bronze medals were awarded to Bulgarian opalchentsi, both those who took direct part in the fighting and those who were present in the theater of war. Thus, this award was common to all who fought for the liberation of Bulgaria.
On the obverse of the medal, at the center, is depicted an Orthodox cross surrounded by radiance, trampling a fallen crescent. This composition, inherited from earlier awards such as the medal "For the Turkish War" of 1829, carried a powerful ideological and religious meaning. In the context of the war of 1877–1878, it was a visual symbol of the victory of the Christian world over the Ottoman Empire and was perceived not only as a military triumph of Russia but also as the liberation of the Orthodox peoples of the Balkans, including the Bulgarians, from the centuries-old Ottoman yoke.
On the reverse of the medal, at the center, is an inscription in four lines:
NOT UNTO US,
NOT UNTO US,
BUT UNTO THY NAME.
This inscription is a quotation from the Psalter (Psalm 113:9): "Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto Thy name give glory, for Thy mercy and for Thy truth's sake." The meaning of this biblical saying is the renunciation of human pride and the attribution of any victory to Divine providence.
The placement of this phrase on the reverse of the medal gave it a deep sacral meaning, emphasizing that the victory was granted from above for faith and a righteous cause. The inscription is framed by two laurel branches tied with a ribbon - the traditional symbol of victory and glory.
This medal became a common mark of recognition of merit for all who took part in the liberation war. For Russian soldiers and officers, it was an award for courage and the fulfillment of a historic mission. For Bulgarian opalchentsi, it was a symbol of entering into combat brotherhood with the Russian army and an official recognition of their role in the liberation of their own country. Its symbolism, combining Orthodox faith, military valor, and humility before the higher will, made this medal not merely a commemorative token but a spiritual testimony about the war.
The Ace of Spades composition is a symbolic illustration of the Romanian army of 1877–1878. Each of its elements tells the story of the path from Ottoman vassal to sovereign power, of the modernization of the troops, and of the role played by Romanian soldiers in the siege of Pleven.
In the background is an oak and laurel wreath entwined with a ribbon in the colors of the Romanian flag (blue, yellow, red), symbolizing strength, victory, and young statehood. The tricolor in its vertical version was established as the national symbol of the principality as early as 1867, and on May 9, 1877, it was officially consecrated as "the very image of the homeland" in an order of the Romanian army. This wreath and flag affirm: Romania entered the war not as a vassal but as an independent subject of international relations.
In the center - the "kettle" or "bombe" headgear placed in the foreground - it belongs to the vanatori (Vânători) chasseurs — elite light infantry created in 1860 on the model of the Italian bersaglieri. Their distinctive hat with a dark green plume or pompom, as well as the general smartness of their uniform, set them apart in the army and emphasized the European, more precisely French, style that predominated in the uniforming of Romanian troops.
In 1877, the 2nd Battalion of Vanatori, together with the 14th Dorobanți Regiment, distinguished itself in the capture of Grivitsa Redoubt No. 1 - one of the key fortifications of Pleven.
Behind the hat are two crossed rifles, representing different generations of weaponry of the Romanian infantry:
The Peabody rifle (Model 1865) - this was the main weapon of the Romanian line infantry in the war of 1877–1878. Romania purchased about 25,000 such rifles of American manufacture. It was a modern, for its time, reliable and powerful single-shot system of 11.43 mm caliber, which proved itself well in combat.
The Dreyse rifle (Model 1841/57) - this is an older German needle-fire system, used by territorial troops and cavalry. By 1877 it was inferior to the Peabody in range and reliability, but due to its large numbers (about 20,000) it constituted a noticeable part of the arsenal, especially in the hands of the Dorobanți and Călărași. Its presence on the card reminds us that the Romanian army had to fight not only with the most modern but also with outdated weapons.
Behind the rifles we see two types of edged weapons. This is the Russian infantry officer's saber (Model 1826) - its presence is connected to the fact that Russia was the main supplier and ally. This emphasizes the close cooperation of the two armies. The second saber - for light cavalry (Model 1822) — is one of the most widespread and recognizable sabers of the 19th century. Purchased by Romania from France in 1861, it was in service with all Romanian cavalry - roșiori, călărași, and mounted gendarmes. Its characteristic complex twisted three-lobed guard protected the hand in battle.
The Galand M.1868 revolver is immediately visible due to the characteristic mechanism beneath the barrel - this weapon, developed by the French designer Charles-François Galand, was known for its innovative design and reliability. Revolvers of this type were in service with the Romanian army and even received the unofficial names "Romanian Army Revolver M.1870" or "M.1874."
The Ace of Spades is a visual manifesto of the Romanian army of 1877. It brings together the symbols of sovereignty (the flag), elitism (the Vanatori hat), technical modernization (the "Peabody"), and the legacy of the past (the "Dreyse," the old sabers). This composition shows that Romania entered the war as a state with a distinctive army, capable of fighting for its independence shoulder to shoulder with its allies.
The King of Spades is embodied by His Highness Prince Carol I of Romania (1839–1914) - a German prince from the House of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, elected Prince of Romania in 1866.
In 1877, Romania, as a vassal of the Ottoman Empire, faced a difficult choice. Carol I, a pragmatic and far-sighted politician, used the Russo-Turkish conflict as a chance to gain full state independence. In May 1877, he pushed a declaration of independence through parliament and concluded a military convention with Russia. Personally leading the Romanian troops, he played a decisive role in the siege of Pleven, especially in the assault on the Grivitsa Redoubt. His soldiers went into the attack under the Romanian flag, and their valor convinced Europe of the combat capability of the new national army.
The Queen of Spades is the Romanian Princess Elisabeth (1843–1916) — born Princess of Wied, wife of Prince Carol I.
During Romania's War of Independence, Princess Elisabeth did not stand aside. Like the Russian Empress, she devoted herself to organizing medical assistance. Under her patronage, military hospitals were established, and she personally visited them to care for the wounded. Soldiers called her the "Mother of the Wounded" (Mama Răniților). Her sincere care and selflessness made a strong impression on her contemporaries and strengthened the army's morale. She became a symbol of humanity and mercy in this bloody war.
The Jack of Spades is Brigadier General George Anghelescu (1839–1900) - one of the most talented and battle-hardened Romanian generals in the war of 1877–1878. Commanding the 3rd Division, he distinguished himself in the bloodiest engagement of the siege of Pleven - the capture of Grivitsa Redoubt No. 1. Anghelescu personally led the attack; his soldiers went into the bayonet charge under hurricane fire, suffering enormous losses but seizing the key Turkish position.
This feat became the turning point of the siege. The general displayed not only courage but also tenacity in defending the captured redoubt, repelling furious Turkish counterattacks. His tactical skill and personal bravery made him one of the main heroes of this war for the Romanians.
The Two of Spades depicts a meeting of officers of the Romanian army staff. The military leadership played a crucial organizational role in the siege of Pleven. Nominal command of the allied forces was entrusted to Prince Carol I, which became an important political gesture emphasizing the sovereign status of the Romanian army. However, actual operational command was exercised by the Russian chief of staff, Lieutenant General P.D. Zotov. The staff councils also included division commanders such as General Alexandru Cernat, whose troops blockaded Pleven from the western direction. Staff work coordinated the actions of the 84,000-strong Russo-Romanian force, ensuring interaction between units and the planning of blockade measures.
The Three of Spades depicts the Romanian light infantry — the Dorobanți, who represented a special type of territorial troops. They performed military service but differed in status from the regular army. In the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878, Romania fielded 16 Dorobanți regiments (two battalions each), and some of them took part in the fighting and distinguished themselves at Pleven.
The Dorobanți formed the backbone of the defense in a number of sectors, covering positions between Vidin and Grivitsa. Their valor was noted not only by the Romanian command but also by Russian contemporaries. Thus, one eyewitness describes how the Dorobanți, stationed in trenches next to a Romanian battery, at a critical moment saved the Russian Major Kvitka from a Turkish pursuit, stopping the enemy with accurate fire.
The Four of Spades depicts the Romanian Danube Flotilla. It provided the key logistical operation of the entire campaign — the crossing of the Danube by the allied forces. The river crossing, carried out on June 15, 1877, would have been unthinkable without the participation of Romanian river vessels, which transported troops, weapons, and ammunition.
Subsequently, during the siege of Pleven, the Danube Flotilla continued to play the role of the main transport artery, ensuring the supply of the allied army and the transfer of reinforcements, including the redeployment of Romanian divisions to Pleven. For participation in these operations, tens of thousands of Russian soldiers and officers were awarded the Romanian Cross "For the Crossing of the Danube." The Four of Spades was created in memory of the sailors.
In the era of smoky battles, when gunpowder haze covered the battlefield and the cries of thousands were drowned in the roar of cannon, the company or regimental banner served as a visual anchor for the attacking infantry. It indicated the direction of the strike, served as a rallying point for reforming after an attack, and was the physical embodiment of the honor and spirit of the unit.
The loss of a banner was considered the greatest disgrace, while its capture from the enemy was the highest manifestation of valor. Thus, during the final battle for Pleven — on December 10, 1877 — Yegor Zhdanov in hand-to-hand combat seized a Turkish regimental banner, which became one of the symbols of victory. The banner inspired soldiers to press forward despite their losses.
The Six of Spades depicts the officers of the Romanian army. In the battles for Pleven, especially during the assault on Grivitsa Redoubt on August 30, 1877, Romanian army officers displayed exceptional courage, often personally leading soldiers into the attack. One such example is the future General Mihail Cerchez, who, commanding the 2nd Division, personally directed operations in the decisive sector and ultimately was the first to enter Pleven after the capitulation.
The officer corps, despite its losses, retained the ability to command troops under the most ferocious fire. But there were tragic moments here as well: due to confusion over routes, the 4th Romanian Division under the command of Colonel A. Anghelescu lost its way and reached Grivitsa only by the morning of August 26, which demonstrates the difficulties of command even at the staff level.
The Seven of Spades depicts the moment of the struggle for the Grivitsa Redoubt. As already noted, the battle banner was of extraordinary importance to both sides of the conflict. During this bloody assault on one of the key fortifications of Pleven, the Romanian chasseurs (Vanatori) distinguished themselves not only by courage but also by a concrete combat success.
According to documents, in the course of the hand-to-hand fighting for the fortifications, Romanian soldiers managed to capture an Ottoman regimental banner. This fact, described by eyewitnesses as a real event, had colossal moral significance. The capture of an enemy banner demonstrated superiority in battle and symbolically debunked the myth of the impregnability of the Turkish positions, inspiring the allied troops to further achievements.
The Eight of Spades depicts the Romanian artillery. It showed itself at its best during the siege of Pleven. According to assessments by Russian military specialists, it acted with dignity and high professionalism. On August 26, 1877, 36 Romanian guns opened massed fire on the Turkish fortifications from a distance of 1,000–1,300 sazhens, inflicting substantial damage on the enemy and clearing the way for the infantry.
In one sector, Major Falcoianu directed the fire of two long-range guns advanced to a distance of only 800 meters from the Turkish positions — a risky but effective tactic. Together with Russian 9-pounder batteries, the Romanian artillery created a powerful fire fist that ultimately broke the defense of Grivitsa Redoubt No. 1, ensuring the success of the assault for the allied forces.
было важным элементом общей оборонительной и наступательной тактики союзников. "
The Nine of Spades depicts the Călărași - the "Red Hussars" - Romanian cavalrymen, close in status and function to light cavalry. They were territorial irregular units. But they actively took part in the siege of Pleven, carrying out tasks of reconnaissance, covering the flanks, and pursuing the enemy.
In August 1877, the cavalry detachment of General Lashkarev, sent to encircle Pleven from the left bank of the Vit River, also included a brigade of roșiori (regular Romanian cavalrymen). In the fighting at the end of August, the roșiori, together with Russian uhlans, repelled attacks by Turkish Circassians and Arnauts, demonstrating steadfastness and combat capability. They were among those who closed the blockade ring, and their presence on the battlefield, as described in the sources, was an important element of the allies' overall defensive and offensive tactics.
The Ten of Spades depicts the cavalry officers. They, as commanders of the roșiori, played a key role in ensuring the mobility of the troops and in decisive maneuvers. Although cavalry could not storm fortified redoubts in mounted formation, its importance lay in swift flanking strikes, the pursuit of the retreating enemy, and, most importantly, the interception of supply routes. It was cavalry patrols, led by officers, that patrolled the roads day and night, preventing the Turks from receiving reinforcements and food. Their attacks, as described in historical chronicles, forced the enemy to retreat and contributed to the complete encirclement of Pleven. For heroic actions and the successful fulfillment of assigned tasks, in particular, Mihail Cerchez was promoted to general on December 1, 1877.
One of the decorative elements of the numbered Spades cards is a Romanian medal with two portraits. This is not merely an award but a living monument to Russo-Romanian combat brotherhood. The award was issued in 1907, for the 30th anniversary of the capture of Grivitsa Redoubt — the key event of the siege of Pleven, where the allied forces won one of their most significant victories.
The official Romanian name is Medalia „În amintirea luării Griviței și eliberării Bulgariei" ("Medal in Memory of the Capture of Grivitsa and the Liberation of Bulgaria"). This award was intended to serve as visual confirmation that Romania entered the war as an equal ally, not as a vassal, as well as a reminder of the sacrifices made on the battlefields.
On the obverse of the medal are left-facing profile bust portraits of two monarchs: Alexander II — Emperor of the Russian Empire — and Carol I (in 1877 he held the title of prince, but by 1907 he had already become King of Romania).
On the reverse of the medal are the state coats of arms of Russia, Romania, and Bulgaria, symbolizing the triumvirate of victors. The reverse also bears a commemorative inscription in three languages — Russian, Romanian, and Bulgarian:
ВЪ ПАМЯТЬ ВЗЯТIЯ ГРИВИЦЫ И ОСВОБОЖДЕНIЯ БОЛГАРIИ
IN AMINTIREA LUAREI GRIVITEI SI A ELIBERAREI BULGARIEI
ВЪ СПОМЕНЪ НА ПРИВЗЕМАНИЕТО НА ГРИВИЦА И ОСВОБОЖДИНИЕТО НА БЪЛГАРИЯ
An interesting detail - on surviving specimens, a spelling error is sometimes found in the Russian version of the inscription: instead of "БОЛГАРIИ" it is engraved as "ВОЛГАРIИ" (the illustration provides an example of this error).
The Ace of Diamonds embodies the Ottoman Empire and its army in the war of 1877–1878. The background wreath entwined with a red ribbon is not merely a decorative element but a powerful symbol of military valor and imperial might, rooted in ancient tradition and adapted by Ottoman culture.
Laurel leaves are a symbol of victory, glory, and triumph. Oak leaves are a symbol of steadfastness, strength, and indomitability. The red ribbon (scarlet being the color of war, blood, and sacrifice) with a crescent and star is an integral symbol of the Ottoman Empire and Islam, as well as of modern Turkey. The crescent and star placed on this wreath affirm that the defense of Pleven is a sacred duty, a struggle for faith and a unified state.
The red fez at the center is not an ordinary piece of headgear but a key symbol of Ottoman identity and 19th-century military reform. It was introduced as a standard for the army in the 1840s as part of the Tanzimat reforms, intended to modernize the empire and unify the appearance of soldiers.
By the end of the 19th century, especially under Sultan Abdul Hamid II, the fez had transformed from a simple element of uniform into a powerful symbol of Ottomanism and Islamic identity. The Sultan, pursuing a policy of Pan-Islamism, attached enormous importance to this, even banning the wearing of European brimmed hats in 1877 in order to preserve the hegemony of the fez. For the soldier of the Pleven garrison, locked in the city and fighting to the last cartridge, the fez was a sign of belonging to a great empire, his honor, and the last reminder of his oath.
The Winchester rifles depicted on the card are likewise not a random choice but a symbol of the technological advantage that the Ottomans managed to exploit at the beginning of the siege. The Empire purchased 45,000 rifles and 5,000 carbines of the Winchester Model 1866 in 1870–1871. This was one of the largest purchases of magazine-fed weapons in the world at that time. The Winchesters played a decisive role in repelling the first assaults on Pleven. The Russian army, armed with single-shot Krnka and Berdan rifles, suffered colossal losses from the rapid fire of the Turkish infantry. The Model 1866 had a high rate of fire thanks to its lever mechanism, which allowed Ottoman soldiers to maintain continuous fire. It was this factor that forced the Russian command to shift from frontal attacks to a methodical siege.
The yataghan is the traditional and most recognizable edged weapon of the Ottoman infantry over the centuries, especially for the Janissaries. A short saber with a blade sharpened on the inner (concave) side and a characteristic hilt with a split pommel ("ears") - the yataghan was effective for both cutting and thrusting strikes in close combat. Although by 1877 the yataghan was already more a symbol of status and tradition than a primary weapon, in hand-to-hand fighting during the storming of redoubts and in the final attempt to break the blockade it was indispensable. Its presence on the card emphasizes the connection to the military traditions and centuries-long history of the Ottoman warrior class.
The second blade is the "kilij" - the classic Ottoman cavalry saber, a variant of Turco-Mongol sabers adapted for mounted combat. The kilij was distinguished by its characteristic strong curve of the blade and a thickening toward the tip ("yalman"), which made it a deadly cutting weapon. It was designed for a single powerful cutting strike from horseback. During the siege of Pleven, the cavalry found itself locked in the city, and the horses were eaten from hunger, but the blade itself remained a symbol of the Ottoman military class. Officers regularly wore kilijs as a sign of their status and origin. On the card, it embodies the valor of the Ottoman cavalry, which was forced to fight on foot.
The Smith & Wesson Model 3 revolvers (Turkish Contract), made of blued steel with an oriental pattern, are evidence of the Ottoman command's attempt to arm the army with the latest technology even in the midst of war. In 1877, the Empire found itself in a desperate situation and urgently purchased a batch of these revolvers. It is known that about 7,000 revolvers were specially converted for it to the .44 Henry Rimfire cartridge so that they would use the same ammunition as the Winchester rifles, simplifying logistics. The weapon was in service with officers, cavalrymen, and auxiliary units. Their appearance in the hands of the Turks at Pleven came as an unpleasant surprise to the enemy, as they provided a high rate of fire in close combat.
The King of Diamonds is His Majesty Sultan Abdul Hamid II (1842–1918) — the head of the Ottoman Empire, who ascended the throne in 1876. His reign began with an attempt at reform (the adoption of a constitution), but the war with Russia forced him to curtail liberal transformations and rely on traditional methods of governing the country. Abdul Hamid II personally controlled the course of the war, appointing and dismissing commanders in an effort to retain control over the Balkans.
After successes at the beginning of the campaign, in May 1877, he solemnly accepted the title "Ghazi" (Victorious), granted to him by the Sheikh-ul-Islam. However, the defeat at Pleven and the loss of most of the European possessions came as a heavy blow to him. It was he who signed the Treaty of San Stefano, humiliating for the Porte, and then made concessions to the European powers at the Berlin Congress, marking the beginning of the empire's decline.
The Queen of Diamonds is Başkadın Nazikeda Kadın Efendi (1848–1895) - an Abkhaz princess by origin, the senior (chief) wife of Sultan Abdul Hamid II. Within the harem hierarchy, her influence was enormous.
She was the Sultan's closest adviser on many matters, including appointments to court positions. Nazikeda was held in great respect for her intelligence, tact, and "refined manners" - which is precisely how her name, given to her at court, is translated (Nâzikedâ - "possessing a delicate nature"). She was the mother of the Sultan's eldest daughter, Ulviye Sultan.
Unlike European queens, she did not hold the title "Her Majesty," and her political role was confined to the walls of the palace, but behind the scenes of the dynasty her influence was significant.
The Jack of Diamonds is Ghazi Osman Nuri Pasha himself (1832–1900) - an outstanding Ottoman military commander, marshal (müşir), national hero of Turkey, known as the "Lion of Pleven."
In July 1877, he carried out a brilliant march-maneuver from Vidin, managing to occupy and fortify Pleven literally one day before the arrival of Russian troops. His talent for defense was phenomenal: he repelled three bloody assaults, inflicting enormous losses on the allied Russo-Romanian forces (over 20,000 men) and forcing them to transition to a blockade.
For five months his army tied down the main enemy forces, displaying wonders of endurance, until hunger and disease broke the garrison. In late November 1877, Osman Pasha made a final, desperate attempt to break out, personally leading the troops, was wounded in the leg, but surrendered only after his army had been defeated. For this incredible defense, the Sultan granted him the title "Ghazi" - Victorious, which he bore with honor until the end of his life.
The Two of Diamonds is illustrated with a Bashibazouk warrior, which literally translates as "reckless head." They represented irregular light infantry - that is, troops not subject to strict military discipline. These detachments were recruited from representatives of the empire's warlike tribes, mainly from Asia Minor and Albania, and were known for their ferocity.
They received no pay and supported themselves through plunder, which made them extremely cruel toward the civilian population. However, as irregular troops, their combat value in clashes with a regular army was low. Sources note that Osman Pasha, seeking to preserve food for the regular units, actively expelled the Bashibazouks from besieged Pleven as "extra mouths." Their role in the siege itself was rather auxiliary and connected with terror in the occupied territories, rather than with the defense of fortifications.
The mounted Bashibazouk detachments performed the functions of mobile but irregular cavalry. Their main tasks were reconnaissance, raids on the enemy's rear, pursuit of retreating forces, and, most importantly, protection of supply routes.
In the context of the siege of Pleven, where provisioning the garrison became a key problem, such mobile detachments could be used to escort food transports. It is known that Osman Pasha relied on mounted detachments to maintain contact with the outside world until the blockade became absolute. However, like the foot Bashibazouks, the mounted ones were unreliable and often abandoned their positions due to hunger and harsh conditions, which forced Osman Pasha to expel most of them from the city in September 1877.
The regular Nizam infantry formed the backbone of the Ottoman defense of Pleven. These were well-trained, disciplined soldiers who, unlike the Bashibazouks, received regular pay and supplies. It was on their shoulders that the main burden of the defense fell: they steadfastly repelled three bloody assaults by the Russo-Romanian forces, demonstrating high morale and professionalism.
Thanks to their steadfastness and the skillfully built fortifications, the defensive line of Pleven proved impregnable to frontal attacks. However, even this elite portion of the troops experienced terrible privations by the end of the siege: soldiers were given a meager ration of a mixture of corn and barley flour, the number of cartridges per man dropped from 300 to 60–80, and despondency grew in the ranks from the awareness of the hopeless situation in the "cage" that Totleben had built for them.
The buglers, or trumpeters, in the Ottoman army, as in any other regular army of that time, performed a critically important function of commanding troops in battle. In the roar of combat, the commander's voice could not be heard, so bugle signals served as the primary means of transmitting orders — from formation and march to signals for attack and retreat.
In siege conditions, when troops were dispersed across a complex system of redoubts and trenches, the role of the buglers increased. Their signals coordinated the movement of reserves, marked the beginning and end of artillery barrages, and served as a kind of "voice" of the commander, maintaining communication between the scattered sectors of the defense. It was difficult and dangerous work, as the buglers were often on the front line and were a conspicuous target for enemy snipers.
The Ottoman officer corps in the war of 1877–1878 was heterogeneous. Some officers received a modern European military education, knew tactics well, and could competently lead subunits. Others — especially in irregular units or those promoted from the ranks — were often illiterate and acted by habit, on courage, which led to enormous and unjustified losses.
In the conditions of the fierce defense of Pleven, where Russian and Romanian attacks followed one after another, the role of officers became decisive. The shortage of competent commanders was acutely felt, and it was on officers such as Osman Pasha or Brigadier General Ahmed Hivzi (who was promoted to ferik for a successful breakthrough with food supplies) that hopes for holding the positions rested.
The role of the Ottoman cavalry during the siege of Pleven was paradoxical. At first it was an important mobile reserve. But when Totleben closed the blockade ring, the cavalry found itself "locked" in the city, where its main advantage — mobility — was reduced to zero.
In the conditions of total famine that reigned in the garrison by the end of the siege, cavalry horses became not a fighting force but a source of food. Sources testify that by the beginning of December 1877, food supplies were completely exhausted, and the defenders of Pleven, including even the elite units (Nizam), were forced to eat horse meat. The defense collapsed, but Osman Pasha's attempted breakout on November 28, where the cavalry made its last attempt to escape the encirclement, went down in history forever as an example of military valor.
The Ten of Diamonds completes the series of cards - Ottoman artillery played a key, if not decisive, role in the defense of Pleven. Skillfully built redoubts (such as Arab Tabia, named after an artillery officer) were equipped with powerful guns that inflicted enormous damage on the advancing Russian and Romanian troops. Turkish gunners, often with foreign (German and British) advisers, fired with extreme accuracy and actively maneuvered their guns on the battlefield.
In one account it is noted that to intensify their fire, the Turks rolled their guns out to open positions, fired, and then rolled them back by hand, becoming invulnerable to return fire. Artillery combined with fortifications made Pleven a "hedgehog fortress." Even after the war, heroic images such as the literary artilleryman Behiç Bey - a symbol of steadfastness and the ideal warrior - were used to inspire patriots.
The corner element of the decoration on the numbered Diamonds cards is the Ottoman medal - a key symbol of the heroic but tragic defense of Pleven in Ottoman military history. It was established by Sultan Abdul Hamid II specifically to reward the defenders of the city.
The official name of the medal is Plevne Muhârebesi Madalyası (translated from Ottoman as "Medal of the Battle of Pleven"). It was established in 1878 (1294 according to the Islamic calendar) to reward all Ottoman soldiers and officers who took part in the heroic defense of the city from July 20 to December 10, 1877. In total, according to some sources, 15,581 specimens of this medal were struck. The award was issued in a single class - in silver.
On the obverse of the medal is depicted the main symbol of sultanic power and Ottoman statehood - the tughra (monogram-cipher) of Sultan Abdul Hamid II. In elegant Arabic calligraphy, the tughra is engraved with the inscription: Abdülhamîd Hân Bin Abdülmecîd El-Muzaffer Dâ'imâ-El-Gâzî (Sultan Abdul Hamid Khan, son of Abdul Mejid, Always Victorious, Ghazi), as well as the date "1294" (1878). The tughra itself is framed by a wreath of laurel leaves, which traditionally symbolizes victory and glory.
The reverse of the medal bears a more complex and symbolic composition, telling the story of the siege itself. At the center are depicted crossed gun barrels and rifles with bayonets, symbolizing the main branches of service that took part in the defense - artillery and infantry. From behind these weapons rises the sun, embodying strength, hope, and new life, and above it is placed an upward-facing crescent with a star - the main symbol of the Ottoman Empire.
The key element of the reverse is the inscription on the crescent, executed in Ottoman calligraphy: Plevne Muhârebesi, which means "The Siege of Pleven" or "The Battle of Pleven." This inscription unambiguously identifies the award. The lower part of the reverse is adorned with the Ottoman coat of arms, which symbolizes the statehood and sovereignty of the empire.
The medal "Plevne Muhârebesi Madalyası" is not merely a commemorative token but a symbol of recognition of the outstanding steadfastness of the Ottoman garrison. It embodies the spirit of resistance that allowed a small army under the command of Osman Pasha to tie down the superior forces of the Russo-Romanian-Bulgarian troops for more than five months. To this day it remains one of the most revered and recognizable combat awards of the Ottoman Empire, a testimony both to military valor and to the tragic finale that befell its defenders.
The deck would not be complete without the "Wild Cards" - the Jokers. The role of the red Joker is played by a British intelligence adviser.
Britain was Russia's most dangerous opponent on the diplomatic stage, acting, as usual, not on the battlefield but behind the scenes. London perceived the war as a threat to its imperial interests: Russia's strengthening in the Balkans meant a potential outlet to the Straits and, consequently, problems for British communications with India. Therefore, Disraeli's government took a firm, though concealed, position against Russia.
The British goal was to prevent Russia from consolidating its position in the Balkans and to preserve the Ottoman Empire as a barrier to Russian influence. At the same time, London exploited the Porte's weakness for its own enrichment — during the war, secret negotiations were held for the purchase of Cyprus, which ultimately took place in 1878.
Britain did not fight openly but actively threatened Russia. The British fleet was brought to combat readiness, and in London the possibility of occupying the Dardanelles was discussed - a step that would effectively have meant war. In addition, British military advisers assisted the Turkish army (even to the point of commanding ships and artillery batteries).
The British "deterrent" factor worked brilliantly. Russia's military successes were nullified at the negotiating table. It was under London's pressure that the Berlin Congress was convened, at which the Russian terms of the Treaty of San Stefano were radically revised. Britain shed no blood but achieved the main thing - it weakened Russia's position in the Balkans and obtained Cyprus.
The role of the black Joker is played by the German Chancellor himself, Otto von Bismarck.
This wild card "shuffles the deck" while remaining in the shadows. He did not take part in the war but became the chief arbiter who determined its political outcome. Germany's goal was not to weaken Russia — it was still needed as a counterweight to France. At the same time, Bismarck did not want to quarrel with Britain and Austria. His main goal was to preserve peace in continental Europe and secure his country's dominant position, acting as an "honest broker."
Bismarck also "lent a shoulder" to Austria-Hungary, but he did so not out of friendship but out of strategic calculation. He understood that Germany needed an ally to contain Russia, and Austria was the ideal candidate. At the Berlin Congress, the German took on the role of chairman and, although he declared neutrality, on all key issues he supported precisely Austria and Britain, forcing Russia to make concessions. As a result, Bosnia and Herzegovina passed under the control of Austria-Hungary, and this decision was largely prepared by Bismarck's position.
As a result, Germany did not gain a single inch of Balkan land, but its diplomatic weight grew enormously. Bismarck showed that the fate of Europe depended precisely on his position. In the caricatures of the time, he was depicted as a puppeteer manipulating emperors, and there was a grain of truth in this — he indeed "led by the nose" all the participants of the congress, extracting benefit for his empire.
Watercolor and Chromolithography: A Dialogue of Techniques
In search of a visual style for the execution of the cards, various sources from the time of the war of 1877–1878 and immediately after it were studied. Black-and-white engraving gradually gave way to color illustrations, which, moreover, were built according to the same rules and amounted to the coloring of contour images. In the collection of the Fabergé Museum in St. Petersburg, as well as in the Borodino Museum in Moscow, there are numerous illustrations executed in watercolor, which beautifully conveys atmosphere and depth. Unfortunately, due to the technique of drawing, such works become too faded and indistinct over time. Therefore, the choice was made in favor of combining a watercolor background with chromolithography in the foreground - this is not merely stylization but a conscious appeal to the visual language of the second half of the 19th century.
The watercolor background creates an effect of aerial perspective and historical distance. Its soft, blurred contours immerse the viewer in the atmosphere of Balkan landscapes, the smoke of battles, and the twilight mood of the epic.
Chromolithography (in older times, engravings were colored by hand or with the help of a stencil) is the technique that dominated the "premium" illustrated publications of that era. It provided clarity and detail, which was necessary for depicting uniforms, weapons, and faces.
This dualism of style, borrowed from the albums of A.S. Romanovsky's "Russian Military Costume of the 19th Century," makes it possible to preserve historical authenticity while at the same time avoiding excessive "lubok" folk stylization. It creates the effect of an old book that you leaf through, sensing the smell of paper and gunpowder.
Works of Artists: From Classics to Anonyms
The compositional solutions of many cards are not invention but a creative reworking of real works of art created in the immediate aftermath or shortly after the war.
Nikolai Dmitriev-Orenburgsky and Vasily Vereshchagin are the main visual chroniclers of the campaign. Their battle paintings have become classic. For example, Dmitriev-Orenburgsky's paintings "General M.D. Skobelev on Horseback" or "The Entry of Alexander II into Pleven" set the canon for depicting key episodes of the siege. Vereshchagin is known for his piercing "Apotheosis of War" and a series of Balkan studies that strike with documentary precision and, at the same time, tragedy.
But there were also "nameless" artists - a whole army of military correspondent-illustrators who worked, for example, for the Russian "Illustrated History" and other periodicals of 1877–1878, including British and French ones. Their sketches, made from life in field conditions, were often no less valuable than the canvases of the masters. They captured daily life, details of uniforms, and the types of soldiers and officers. The sketches were then turned into full-fledged black-and-white engravings and circulated throughout Europe. Many of these drawings, preserved today in private collections and archives, have become an invaluable source for recreating the authentic appearance of the card characters.
Museum Collections: A Foundation in Authenticity
However, taking a subject from a sketch or a black-and-white engraving is not enough for a full-fledged illustration. What matters are the colors, nuances, and details that are lost by an artist drawing in haste or in the heat of battle. Therefore, all images were verified against the catalogs of real museum exhibits, as well as against the works of Bulgarian and Turkish reenactors, which guarantees historical accuracy.
As a result, in working on the deck, catalogs from Bulgarian, Russian, Romanian, and Turkish museums were used, especially, of course, the Panorama Museum in Pleven.
Thus, the "Siege of Pleven" deck is not merely a game but an interactive catalog of the illustrative and material heritage of that war, assembled together through a dialogue of two centuries.